W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > December 1997

Re: Backwards compatibility of new selectors (was: Color mo

From: Chris Lilley <Chris.Lilley@sophia.inria.fr>
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 1997 18:51:48 +0100 (MET)
Message-Id: <9712041851.ZM1031@grommit.inria.fr>
To: neil@bigpic.com, Douglas Rand <drand@sgi.com>, www-style@w3.org
On Dec 2,  1:54pm, Neil St.Laurent wrote:

> > Not an argument for breaking bc.  As above - the spec is not easy to
> > follow.  It is not suprising that nobody has it right.
>
> If you are referring to the grammar used by CSS then I could probably
> provide a real grammar for the language -- the one we are using to
> parse CSS2.

Please do, we would like to see it

>  The grammar provided by the specification I find to be
> laid out very bad

in what way?

> and has errors in it.

Which we can only fix when you tell us about them ... ;-)

-- 
Chris Lilley, W3C                          [ http://www.w3.org/ ]
Graphics and Fonts Guy            The World Wide Web Consortium
http://www.w3.org/people/chris/              INRIA,  Projet W3C
chris@w3.org                       2004 Rt des Lucioles / BP 93
+33 (0)4 93 65 79 87       06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France
Received on Thursday, 4 December 1997 12:53:36 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:53:53 GMT