- From: Chris Lilley <Chris.Lilley@sophia.inria.fr>
- Date: Thu, 4 Dec 1997 18:51:48 +0100 (MET)
- To: neil@bigpic.com, Douglas Rand <drand@sgi.com>, www-style@w3.org
On Dec 2, 1:54pm, Neil St.Laurent wrote: > > Not an argument for breaking bc. As above - the spec is not easy to > > follow. It is not suprising that nobody has it right. > > If you are referring to the grammar used by CSS then I could probably > provide a real grammar for the language -- the one we are using to > parse CSS2. Please do, we would like to see it > The grammar provided by the specification I find to be > laid out very bad in what way? > and has errors in it. Which we can only fix when you tell us about them ... ;-) -- Chris Lilley, W3C [ http://www.w3.org/ ] Graphics and Fonts Guy The World Wide Web Consortium http://www.w3.org/people/chris/ INRIA, Projet W3C chris@w3.org 2004 Rt des Lucioles / BP 93 +33 (0)4 93 65 79 87 06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France
Received on Thursday, 4 December 1997 12:53:36 UTC