W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-smil@w3.org > April to June 2008

Re: Is public XMLSchema correct?

From: Alberto Zanon <alberto.zanon@edistar.com>
Date: Mon, 5 May 2008 23:00:56 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <17071605.post@talk.nabble.com>
To: www-smil@w3.org

Hi all,
no one could help me?

Thanks in advance

Alberto Zanon wrote:
> Hi all,
> I'm a software developer of an Italian company and I'm developing a
> gateway for MMS service.
> Purpose of my email is to find out how to validate smil documents against
> smil xmlschema definition.
> When I tried the first time with PHP, it gaves me errors about the
> xmlschema definition I supplied
> ("http://www.w3.org/2001/SMIL20/smil20.xsd").
> As PHP xml classes rely on libxml2 (www.xmlsoft.org), I tried directly
> with a small C example program,
> but results were the same. So I opened a bug in bugzilla.gnome.org
> (http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=523004)
> They answered that the xmlschema definition seems incorrect about
> "smil20-layout.xsd" include.
> I report their answer:
> No idea if it's a bug in libxml2 or not.
> smil20.xsd includes smil20-layout.xsd around line 22
> smil20-layout.xsd uses a reference to a namespaced type
> the bindings seems to be done with import statements in
> smil20.xsd but after the include.
> I don't understand the XSD Part 1 spec, I have no idea
> if it's legal to bind to something which was not imported yet
> at that point.
> Could you give me some information about this problem?
> It will be very appreciated.
> Best regards,
> Alberto

View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Is-public-XMLSchema-correct--tp16173269p17071605.html
Sent from the w3.org - www-smil mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Received on Tuesday, 6 May 2008 06:01:32 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:34:28 UTC