W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-smil@w3.org > April to June 2008

Re: Is public XMLSchema correct?

From: Jack Jansen <Jack.Jansen@cwi.nl>
Date: Wed, 14 May 2008 21:16:09 +0200
Cc: www-smil@w3.org
Message-Id: <8016C286-2925-403B-9583-0472697D7568@cwi.nl>
To: Alberto Zanon <alberto.zanon@edistar.com>


On 6-May-2008, at 08:00 , Alberto Zanon wrote:
>
>
> Hi all,
> no one could help me?

Sorry for the delay. Apparently none of the people from the SYMM group  
who are also on this list knew the answer, and were expecting someone  
else to answer. I forwarded it to the internal list, and here's a reply:

> From: Samuel Cruz-Lara <Samuel.Cruz-Lara@loria.fr>
> Date: May 14, 2008 10:24:45 GMT+02:00
> To: Jack Jansen <Jack.Jansen@cwi.nl>
> Subject: Re: Question on xml schema on public mailing list
>
> Please Jack, forward the answer.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Samuel
>
> Le 13 mai 08 à 22:50, Jack Jansen a écrit :
>
>> Thanks for the work!
>>
>> Will you reply (are you on the external list?) or shall I forward  
>> your answer?
>> On  13-May-2008, at 08:58 , Samuel Cruz-Lara wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Jack,
>>>
>>> I have verifyed the XML Schema for SMIL 2.0. (http://www.w3.org/2001/SMIL20/smil20.xsd 
>>> )
>>>
>>> The schema is NOT correct.
>>>
>>> So, by far, the best thing to do is to work with the SMIL 2.1 DTD.
>>>
>>> However, if Alberto ZANON would like to contact me, I can try to  
>>> work on this DTD in order to obtain a valid XML Schema for him.
>>>
>>> What do you think?
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>>
>>> Samuel

If you need more information please contact Samuel directly.

Hope this helps,
	Jack

>
>
> Thanks in advance
> Alberto
>
>
> Alberto Zanon wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'm a software developer of an Italian company and I'm developing a
>> gateway for MMS service.
>> Purpose of my email is to find out how to validate smil documents  
>> against
>> smil xmlschema definition.
>> When I tried the first time with PHP, it gaves me errors about the
>> xmlschema definition I supplied
>> ("http://www.w3.org/2001/SMIL20/smil20.xsd").
>> As PHP xml classes rely on libxml2 (www.xmlsoft.org), I tried  
>> directly
>> with a small C example program,
>> but results were the same. So I opened a bug in bugzilla.gnome.org
>> (http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=523004)
>> They answered that the xmlschema definition seems incorrect about
>> "smil20-layout.xsd" include.
>> I report their answer:
>>
>> No idea if it's a bug in libxml2 or not.
>> smil20.xsd includes smil20-layout.xsd around line 22
>> smil20-layout.xsd uses a reference to a namespaced type
>> the bindings seems to be done with import statements in
>> smil20.xsd but after the include.
>> I don't understand the XSD Part 1 spec, I have no idea
>> if it's legal to bind to something which was not imported yet
>> at that point.
>>
>> Could you give me some information about this problem?
>> It will be very appreciated.
>>
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Alberto
>>
>
> -- 
> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Is-public-XMLSchema-correct--tp16173269p17071605.html
> Sent from the w3.org - www-smil mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
Received on Wednesday, 14 May 2008 19:16:49 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:53:30 GMT