W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-smil@w3.org > April to June 2008

Re: Timesheets - UA Capability Detection

From: Jeff Schiller <codedread@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 14 May 2008 11:10:44 -0500
Message-ID: <da131fde0805140910y5bab2fabmd07b2b8dc10fbb04@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Jack Jansen" <Jack.Jansen@cwi.nl>
Cc: www-smil@w3.org, cam@mcc.id.au
Hi Jack and SYMM WG,

Can we have a response on this - would it be possible to include a mention
of the SMIL Timesheet feature string in the Timesheet spec and a reference
to the DOM hasFeature method?

Seems like http://www.w3.org/2007/07/SMIL30/Timesheets would make the most
sense.

Thanks,
Jeff

On 4/8/08, Jeff Schiller <codedread@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Jack,
>
> http://www.w3.org/TR/DOM-Level-2-Core/core.html#ID-5CED94D7 is the DOM
> hasFeature method.  It mentions how the SVG did things, which is here:
> http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG11/feature.html and
> http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG11/svgdom.html#FeatureStrings
>
> Regards,
> Jeff
>
> On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 4:06 AM, Jack Jansen <Jack.Jansen@cwi.nl> wrote:
>
>>
>> On 8 apr 2008, at 07:50, Jeff Schiller wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks, Cameraon for the suggestion.
>>>
>>> SYMM Working Group,
>>>
>>> Can we have a response on this?  I think the feature string hasFeature()
>>> check is a good idea, but the feature string would need to be defined in the
>>> spec.  "org.w3.smil.timesheet" ?
>>>
>>
>>
>> Jeff,
>> do you have examples of other specs that have such a reference? The
>> suggested functionality sounds pretty useful, but it would fall under a
>> "best practices" or "integration suggestions" heading, and we haven't done
>> such before...
>>  --
>> Jack Jansen, <Jack.Jansen@cwi.nl>, http://www.cwi.nl/~jack<http://www.cwi.nl/%7Ejack>
>> If I can't dance I don't want to be part of your revolution -- Emma
>> Goldman
>>
>>
>>
>
Received on Wednesday, 14 May 2008 16:11:30 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:53:30 GMT