W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-rules@w3.org > August 2004

Re: Probable bug in swrl.owl

From: Rinke Hoekstra <hoekstra@lri.jur.uva.nl>
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2004 09:55:43 +0200
Message-ID: <4129A2FF.5000603@lri.jur.uva.nl>
To: www-rdf-rules@w3.org

> The stuff at W3C is a submission to W3C.  W3C has not yet started any
> activity in this space, so no other documents have been produced by W3C in
> this area, as far as I know.
> The most recent stuff on SWRL produced by the Joint Committee can be found
> at 
> 	http://www.daml.org/rules/
> Version 0.6 there is very close to the submission to W3C.
> The Joint Committee is still active so there is the chance that any
> problems in version 0.6 of SWRL will be fixed.

Ok, I will use the Daml website as my point of reference, thanks.


> peter
> [[Yes, this doesn't answer your technical point.]]
> From: Rinke Hoekstra <hoekstra@lri.jur.uva.nl>
> Subject: Probable bug in swrl.owl
> Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2004 16:07:15 +0200
>>Hi All,
>>I just stumbled upon a bug in the swrl.owl file downloadable at 
>>http://www.w3.org/Submission/SWRL/swrl.owl (this is the version 
>>submitted to the W3C). The swrl:argument2 property is defined as an 
>>rdf:Property instead of an owl:ObjectProperty.
>>It could be that this has already been fixed, but it's quite hard to 
>>find the latest version of any SWRL-related document (to be honest): 
>>where should I look?
>>	Rinke Hoekstra
>>Rinke Hoekstra hoekstra@lri.jur.uva.nl
>>T: +31-20-5253499    F: +31-20-5253495
>>Leibniz Center for Law,    Law Faculty
>>University of Amsterdam,   PO Box 1030
>>1000 BA  Amsterdam,    The Netherlands

Rinke Hoekstra hoekstra@lri.jur.uva.nl
T: +31-20-5253499    F: +31-20-5253495
Leibniz Center for Law,    Law Faculty
University of Amsterdam,   PO Box 1030
1000 BA  Amsterdam,    The Netherlands
Received on Monday, 23 August 2004 07:55:47 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:53:11 GMT