W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-rules@w3.org > August 2004

Re: Probable bug in swrl.owl

From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2004 11:00:08 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <20040819.110008.133155762.pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
To: hoekstra@lri.jur.uva.nl
Cc: www-rdf-rules@w3.org

The stuff at W3C is a submission to W3C.  W3C has not yet started any
activity in this space, so no other documents have been produced by W3C in
this area, as far as I know.

The most recent stuff on SWRL produced by the Joint Committee can be found
at 
	http://www.daml.org/rules/
Version 0.6 there is very close to the submission to W3C.

The Joint Committee is still active so there is the chance that any
problems in version 0.6 of SWRL will be fixed.

peter

[[Yes, this doesn't answer your technical point.]]


From: Rinke Hoekstra <hoekstra@lri.jur.uva.nl>
Subject: Probable bug in swrl.owl
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2004 16:07:15 +0200

> 
> Hi All,
> 
> I just stumbled upon a bug in the swrl.owl file downloadable at 
> http://www.w3.org/Submission/SWRL/swrl.owl (this is the version 
> submitted to the W3C). The swrl:argument2 property is defined as an 
> rdf:Property instead of an owl:ObjectProperty.
> 
> It could be that this has already been fixed, but it's quite hard to 
> find the latest version of any SWRL-related document (to be honest): 
> where should I look?
> 
> Regards,
> 
> 	Rinke Hoekstra
> 
> 
> -- 
> --------------------------------------
> Rinke Hoekstra hoekstra@lri.jur.uva.nl
> T: +31-20-5253499    F: +31-20-5253495
> Leibniz Center for Law,    Law Faculty
> University of Amsterdam,   PO Box 1030
> 1000 BA  Amsterdam,    The Netherlands
> --------------------------------------
Received on Thursday, 19 August 2004 14:56:35 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:53:11 GMT