W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-logic@w3.org > September 2001

Re: model theory for RDF/S

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 01:38:51 -0500
Message-ID: <3BB41AFB.6D1B16F0@w3.org>
To: Pat Hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>
CC: www-rdf-logic@w3.org
Pat Hayes wrote:
> 
> >"Peter F. Patel-Schneider" wrote:
> >>
> >>  I am concerned that this model theory locks RDF into a particular
> >>  way of interpreting literals, namely that the interpretation of a literal
> >>  can be completely determined from its label, using a fixed mapping to
> >>  literal values.
> >
> >I believe this is by design. It's an important requirement on
> >RDF syntax that it be "context free"... i.e. that this
> >level of meaning is syntactically evident.
> 
> Context free, right, but that 'syntactically evident' may depend on
> more than a simple label, as far as the model theory is concerned.

I don't think so... this is the whole point of
the global XL mapping, no? i.e. once you've
got the lexical form of a literal, you can
immediately conclude what it denotes.

> The MT is (deliberately) agnostic about the exact nature of lexical
> items in any particular lexicalization.

Then what am I to make of this?

  "We assume a global set LV of literal values and a fixed
  mapping XL from the set of literals to LV."

  -- http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/WD-rdf-mt-20010925/#urisandlit


-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Friday, 28 September 2001 02:38:53 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 2 March 2016 11:10:36 UTC