> ><_s> <p> <_o> > ><p> <rdfs:range> <rdfs:Literal> > > That would be meaningful under the MT. It would follow that _o > denoted a literal value, however, not that _o *was* a literal. As > far as I know, this would also be considered legal RDFS syntax. Thanks, that's what i wanted to hear. -AMReceived on Wednesday, 24 October 2001 16:07:59 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 08:34:48 GMT