Re: <p> <rdfs:range> <rdfs:Literal>

> ><_s> <p> <_o>
> ><p> <rdfs:range> <rdfs:Literal>
> 
> That would be meaningful under the MT. It would follow that _o 
> denoted a literal value, however, not that _o *was* a literal.  As 
> far as I know, this would also be considered legal RDFS syntax.

Thanks,  that's what i wanted to hear.

-AM

Received on Wednesday, 24 October 2001 16:07:59 UTC