>Perhaps this is something that has already been discussed but I want to >check an assumption. Under RDF Model Theory [1], are the following triples >legal RDFS? > ><_s> <p> <_o> ><p> <rdfs:range> <rdfs:Literal> That would be meaningful under the MT. It would follow that _o denoted a literal value, however, not that _o *was* a literal. As far as I know, this would also be considered legal RDFS syntax. >What about under http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/CR-rdf-schema-20000327/ or the >previous version? That you would need to check with others. Pat Hayes -- --------------------------------------------------------------------- IHMC (850)434 8903 home 40 South Alcaniz St. (850)202 4416 office Pensacola, FL 32501 (850)202 4440 fax phayes@ai.uwf.edu http://www.coginst.uwf.edu/~phayesReceived on Wednesday, 24 October 2001 15:59:54 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 08:34:48 GMT