- From: Pat Hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>
- Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2001 14:59:22 -0500
- To: "Aaron Michal" <amichal@intellidimension.com>
- Cc: www-rdf-logic@w3.org
>Perhaps this is something that has already been discussed but I want to >check an assumption. Under RDF Model Theory [1], are the following triples >legal RDFS? > ><_s> <p> <_o> ><p> <rdfs:range> <rdfs:Literal> That would be meaningful under the MT. It would follow that _o denoted a literal value, however, not that _o *was* a literal. As far as I know, this would also be considered legal RDFS syntax. >What about under http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/CR-rdf-schema-20000327/ or the >previous version? That you would need to check with others. Pat Hayes -- --------------------------------------------------------------------- IHMC (850)434 8903 home 40 South Alcaniz St. (850)202 4416 office Pensacola, FL 32501 (850)202 4440 fax phayes@ai.uwf.edu http://www.coginst.uwf.edu/~phayes
Received on Wednesday, 24 October 2001 15:59:54 UTC