We've been processing some of the DAML example ontologies with standard RDF tools and of course they can't handle the DAML collection syntax. This is a bit of pain really. Why not use an RDF syntax? Is the new syntax defined - then we could modify our parser? Brian McBride HPLabsReceived on Wednesday, 10 January 2001 14:28:09 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:52:38 GMT