W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-logic@w3.org > April 2001

Re: ".daml" (RE: DAML+OIL (March 2001) released)

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2001 10:26:46 -0500
Message-ID: <3ADC60B6.56B8E1A6@w3.org>
To: "Balon, Corey" <cbalon@grci.com>, Mike Dean <mdean@bbn.com>
CC: www-rdf-logic@w3.org
breifly...

"Balon, Corey" wrote:
[...]
>     -Is everything really correct. When I use "...daml+oil-ex.daml"
>         my code is supposed to see 2 Persons, and when I use
>         "...daml+oil-ex" its only supposed to see one Person

Yes, that's right.

That is: you're not supposed to use "...daml+oil-ex.daml"
normally. (you might need it for debugging etc.)

(another view is: the references in daml+oil-ex.daml
should be absolute so that it doesn't matter what
address you use to get the info; but I don't agree
with that view.)

Oops... the link from
  http://www.daml.org/2001/03/daml+oil-index
goes there; i.e. to
  http://www.daml.org/2001/03/daml+oil-ex.daml

Mike, please fix; it should go to
  http://www.daml.org/2001/03/daml+oil-ex

While you're at it, mike, please get rid
of the in-your-face URLs (even though they're relative).
That is, in stead of using the filename
as the link text...

  _daml+oil-walkthru.html_ - an annotated version
     of the example ontology 

just use the title:

  _Annotated DAML+OIL (March 2001) Ontology Markup_


Hmm... I once had sufficient access to make such changes.
I wonder if I still do...


Hmm... we should perhaps figure out a nice XSLT stylesheet
for displaying DAML stuff...

-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Tuesday, 17 April 2001 11:27:06 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:52:38 GMT