- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2001 10:26:46 -0500
- To: "Balon, Corey" <cbalon@grci.com>, Mike Dean <mdean@bbn.com>
- CC: www-rdf-logic@w3.org
breifly...
"Balon, Corey" wrote:
[...]
> -Is everything really correct. When I use "...daml+oil-ex.daml"
> my code is supposed to see 2 Persons, and when I use
> "...daml+oil-ex" its only supposed to see one Person
Yes, that's right.
That is: you're not supposed to use "...daml+oil-ex.daml"
normally. (you might need it for debugging etc.)
(another view is: the references in daml+oil-ex.daml
should be absolute so that it doesn't matter what
address you use to get the info; but I don't agree
with that view.)
Oops... the link from
http://www.daml.org/2001/03/daml+oil-index
goes there; i.e. to
http://www.daml.org/2001/03/daml+oil-ex.daml
Mike, please fix; it should go to
http://www.daml.org/2001/03/daml+oil-ex
While you're at it, mike, please get rid
of the in-your-face URLs (even though they're relative).
That is, in stead of using the filename
as the link text...
_daml+oil-walkthru.html_ - an annotated version
of the example ontology
just use the title:
_Annotated DAML+OIL (March 2001) Ontology Markup_
Hmm... I once had sufficient access to make such changes.
I wonder if I still do...
Hmm... we should perhaps figure out a nice XSLT stylesheet
for displaying DAML stuff...
--
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Tuesday, 17 April 2001 11:27:06 UTC