W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > January 2005

Re: Reasoning

From: Jaya Kawale <jayak@cse.iitk.ac.in>
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 20:38:27 +0530
Message-ID: <003501c502ef$bb5c12e0$6d621aac@eliza>
To: "Jeen Broekstra" <jeen@aduna.biz>
Cc: <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>

Hi Jeen,
Thanks a lot for your reply. But what I was trying to do was to express the
semantics using conceptual graphs. I have parsed them in my Java structures.
I now wanted to reason using Prolog. so basically, my data is not expressed
in RDF. Hence wanted to know which of the two Prolog Engine would be better
for a general reasoning system.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Jeen Broekstra" <jeen@aduna.biz>
To: "Jaya Kawale" <jayak@cse.iitk.ac.in>
Cc: <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2005 7:42 PM
Subject: Re: Reasoning

> Jaya Kawale wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> > I wanted to do some amout of reasoning for my semantic web search
> > engine. I want to know whether I should use XSB Prolog or SWI Prolog ?
> > Someone please help me in this regard.
> I'm not familiar with XSB Prolog, but I know that SWI Prolog offers a
> Semantic Web library package (see
> http://www.swi-prolog.org/packages/semweb.html), that is well tested
> and used by a number of SW developers. Perhaps that is a good
> starting point?
> Jeen
> --
> Jeen Broekstra          Aduna BV
> Knowledge Engineer      Julianaplein 14b, 3817 CS Amersfoort
> http://aduna.biz        The Netherlands
> tel. +31(0)33 46599877  fax. +31(0)33 46599877
Received on Tuesday, 25 January 2005 15:05:24 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:07:55 UTC