W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > January 2005

RXR, TriplesXML or TriX? Anyone?

From: Brian Manley <bmanley@granite.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 11:04:15 -0500
Message-ID: <C83F12FB81476D4280A4AF1E89BCCAA4A6B745@grant.granite.com>
To: <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>


All,

Given the current discussion regarding RDF/XML serialization alternatives, I was wondering why there doesn't seem to be more interest in formats such as RXR, TriplesML or TriX. Each seems reasonably sane to me. Is there some flaw in these proposed formats that have prevented their adoption?

Brian

Received on Friday, 14 January 2005 16:01:47 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Ian Davis: "Re: xml without rdf, but with an ontology [0]"
Previous message: Phil Dawes: "Re: xml without rdf, but with an ontology [0]"
Next in thread: Dave Beckett: "Re: RXR, TriplesXML or TriX? Anyone?"
Reply: Dave Beckett: "Re: RXR, TriplesXML or TriX? Anyone?"
Reply: Eric Jain: "Re: RXR, TriplesXML or TriX? Anyone?"
Reply: Phil Dawes: "Re: RXR, TriplesXML or TriX? Anyone?"
Maybe reply: Victor Lindesay: "Re: RXR, TriplesXML or TriX? Anyone?"
Reply: Reto Bachmann-Gmuer: "Re: RXR, TriplesXML or TriX? Anyone?"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:52:12 GMT