W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > January 2005

Re: RXR, TriplesXML or TriX? Anyone?

From: Eric Jain <Eric.Jain@isb-sib.ch>
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 18:59:33 +0100
Message-ID: <41E80885.7070603@isb-sib.ch>
To: Brian Manley <bmanley@granite.com>
CC: rdf-interest <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>

Brian Manley wrote:
> Is there some flaw in these proposed formats that 
 > have prevented their adoption?

Speaking for myself:

1. Too verbose. The official syntax isn't exactly slim either, but can 
still be realistically used to exchange larger data sets.

2. Too exotic. The official syntax allows documents to be presented in a 
way that can be understood by people who don't care what a triple is.
Received on Friday, 14 January 2005 17:55:43 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:52:12 GMT