- From: <kurt.godden@GM.com>
- Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 09:20:26 -0400
- To: www-rdf-interest@w3.org
Oops, I accidentally sent that before I was done. Just a wee bit more:
So it seems to me that I should simply omit specifying any ranges for
isPartOf. Then I can attach it to any domain that I need. Does that sound
reasonable to others?
-KG
----- Forwarded by Kurt S Godden/US/GM/GMC on 09/23/2004 09:18 AM -----
kurt.godden@gm.com
Sent by: To: www-rdf-interest@w3.org
www-rdf-interest-req cc:
uest@w3.org Subject: rdfs:range with dcterms:isPartOf
09/23/2004 09:10 AM
Suppose
Brakepad isPartOf BrakeAssembly.
and
BrakeAssembly isPartOf Vehicle.
It seems like I can NOT specify that there is an rdfs:range on
dcterms:isPartOf for the class Vehicle as well as the class BrakeAssembly.
The reason is because the RDF Schema spec says "Where P has more than one
rdfs:range, then the resources denoted by the objects...are instances of
*all* the classes..." [emphasis added].
Kurt Godden
GM Technical Fellow
GM R&D, Warren, MI
ph: 586-986-0445; em: kurt.godden@gm.com
"I distrust a research person who is always obviously busy on a task."
---Robert A. Frosch, VP (retired), GM Research
Received on Thursday, 23 September 2004 13:21:09 UTC