W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > September 2004

Re: Upcoming wave of quad/namedgraph implementations ,was: Reification - whats best practice?

From: Damian Steer <damian.steer@hp.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2004 10:37:42 +0100
Message-Id: <10020B25-030D-11D9-A4EA-000D932B9016@hp.com>
Cc: Phil Dawes <pdawes@users.sourceforge.net>, <www-rdf-interest@w3.org> <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
To: "Chris Bizer" <chris@bizer.de>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


On 10 Sep 2004, at 10:14, Chris Bizer wrote:

 > We will see a wave of quad/namedgraph-based implementations being 
released
 > in the next weeks.

A quick follow up on this: I think it might be useful if people who 
need the ability to track the source(s) of a statement could provide 
use cases for dawg <mailto:public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org>. I know 
Phil Dawes has a use case, mentioned at foaf galway.

DAWG people: Is this a good idea?

Damian Steer
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (Darwin)

iD8DBQFBQXXuAyLCB+mTtykRAg8/AKC/f/YfUBzdboYOcofZ1ORvvheLbgCg5VPn
ii/TZNQJ2P/UCZMnpn7gsS0=
=27pd
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Friday, 10 September 2004 09:38:26 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:52:09 GMT