Re: Upcoming wave of quad/namedgraph implementations ,was: Reification - whats best practice?

Just a reminder about MKR, since I have not contributed to this discussion.
My MKR language has a named context for every statement.
This essentially provides a named graph capability, but this
capability is NOT expressed in any of my RDF interfaces.

Dick McCullough
knowledge := man do identify od existent done;
knowledge haspart proposition list;
http://rhm.cdepot.net/

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Chris Bizer" <chris@bizer.de>
To: <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
Cc: "Andrew Newman" <andrew@tucanatech.com>; "Richard Cyganiak" 
<richard@cyganiak.de>
Sent: Friday, September 10, 2004 2:14 AM
Subject: Upcoming wave of quad/namedgraph implementations ,was: 
Reification - whats best practice?


>
> Hi all,
>
> it really looks like this reification discussion make some people sit down
> and work :-)
>
> We will see a wave of quad/namedgraph-based implementations being released
> in the next weeks. Up to my knowledge, the following people are currently
> working on implementations:
>
> 1. We are working on a NamedGraph API extending Jena
> http://www.wiwiss.fu-berlin.de/suhl/bizer/ng4j/
> 2. Andy Seaborne and Rave Reynolds work on a Jena Multimodel
> http://www.swed.org.uk/swed/doc/javadoc/com/hp/hpl/jena/util/MultiModel.html
> 3. Andrew Newman said that Kowari 1.0.5 will somehow support
> quads/namedgraphs (??),
> http://kowari.sourceforge.net/
> 4. Phil Dawes implements a store in python which will support
> quads/namedgraphs
> 5. RDF Gateway already supports quads
> http://www.intellidimension.com/default.rsp?topic=/pages/site/products/rdfgateway.rsp
>
> Anybody else?
>
> Competition is always fun ;-)
>
> Chris Bizer
>
>
>
>

Received on Friday, 10 September 2004 09:26:46 UTC