W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > May 2004

Re: Incompatibilities in RDQL implementations

From: Andrew Newman <andrew@tucanatech.com>
Date: Fri, 07 May 2004 09:14:13 +1000
Message-ID: <409AC6C5.2070700@tucanatech.com>
To: www-rdf-interest@w3.org

Andrew Newman wrote:
> Seaborne, Andy wrote:
>> Imy hope is that implementations are relaxed about what they accept.
>> My current test suite covers old and new syntactic forms for backwards
>> compatibility:
>> http://jena.hpl.hp.com/2003/07/query/rdql-tests-jena-2.1a.zip
>> Check http://jena.hpl.hp.com/2003/07/query/ as later versions appear.
> The distinction in QNames is a nice feature - so good that it's worth 
> stealing (or reimplmenting) into iTQL.
> Kowari's implementation of RDQL passes the set of tests distributed with 
> Jena 2.1 which was confusingly called "rdql-tests-jena-2.0.zip".  I'm 
> not sure what the differences are between that and the one linked.

I made a mistake here that might have given the wrong impression (not 

I meant "parsers the set of tests" not "passes".  The tests have 
xsd:string in them which is not a currently supported data type in Kowari.
Received on Thursday, 6 May 2004 19:14:39 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:07:51 UTC