W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > May 2004

Re: Incompatibilities in RDQL implementations

From: Andrew Newman <andrew@tucanatech.com>
Date: Fri, 07 May 2004 05:54:46 +1000
Message-ID: <409A9806.8020109@tucanatech.com>
To: www-rdf-interest@w3.org

Seaborne, Andy wrote:

> Imy hope is that implementations are relaxed about what they accept.
> My current test suite covers old and new syntactic forms for backwards
> compatibility:
> http://jena.hpl.hp.com/2003/07/query/rdql-tests-jena-2.1a.zip
> Check http://jena.hpl.hp.com/2003/07/query/ as later versions appear.

The distinction in QNames is a nice feature - so good that it's worth 
stealing (or reimplmenting) into iTQL.

Kowari's implementation of RDQL passes the set of tests distributed with 
Jena 2.1 which was confusingly called "rdql-tests-jena-2.0.zip".  I'm 
not sure what the differences are between that and the one linked.
Received on Thursday, 6 May 2004 15:55:02 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:07:51 UTC