W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > June 2004

Fwd: [protege-owl] Re: foaf inclusion

From: Stephen Rhoads <rhoadsnyc@mac.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 16:57:51 -0400
Message-ID: <6703772.1088542671490.JavaMail.rhoadsnyc@mac.com>
To: www-rdf-interest@w3.org


Over @ Protege-OWL Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net> Wrote:

> Great thanks. That nearly works correctly.  It highlights a bug
> in Protégé: the content negotiation for these metadata files is
> not done correctly. The namespace required for foaf is
> http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/  If you request that page from a
> normal html web browser it will return a human readable html
> description of the foaf classes. If your client requests the
> mime type for rdf files, it will return the OWL ontology itself
> in rdf format.

Did I miss something?  When did folks start implementing this?

--- Stephen
Received on Tuesday, 29 June 2004 16:57:53 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:52:07 GMT