W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > August 2004

Re: Reification - whats best practice?

From: Eric Jain <Eric.Jain@isb-sib.ch>
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 12:15:31 +0200
Message-ID: <412DB843.8080305@isb-sib.ch>
To: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
CC: "'RDF interesting groupe'" <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>


> Quads are also a bad standard since they
> mean different things to different people; i.e. not a standard.

That's precisely why they need to be standardized, to ensure that they 
mean the same things to different people :-)

Received on Thursday, 26 August 2004 10:15:14 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Danny Ayers: "Re: RSS data transience and the semantic web"
Previous message: Steve Harris: "Re: Reification - whats best practice?"
In reply to: Dave Beckett: "Re: Reification - whats best practice?"
Next in thread: Steve Harris: "Re: Reification - whats best practice?"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:52:08 GMT