- From: Steve Harris <S.W.Harris@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 10:59:40 +0100
- To: www-rdf-interest@w3.org
On Thu, Aug 26, 2004 at 09:59:02 +0100, Hamish Harvey wrote: > > Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com wrote: > > > In my published RDF files, I just assert things about the RDF/XML > > serialized document. Eg. that I'm its dc:creator or foaf:maker. I > > also like using a wot:assurance property to relate it to the > > output of the PGP/GPG signing process. > > > >If I'm understanding you right Dan, your approach seems to be > >the same, in essence, as named graphs, where one makes statements > >about the graph, which allows one to infer things about the > >statements within that graph. > > > > > > Isn't it the same in essence, except for the fact that it's polluting? > When you start doing that it becomes impossible to differentiate between > statements about the *graph* and statements about the *rdf document*. Only if they have the same URI. You can differentiate graphs with anything (say a bNode), and use some property to link the graph to the document URI. - Steve
Received on Thursday, 26 August 2004 09:59:47 UTC