W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > August 2004

RE: Reification - whats best practice?

From: <Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 12:08:54 +0300
Message-ID: <1E4A0AC134884349A21955574A90A7A50A1C28@trebe051.ntc.nokia.com>
To: <larsga@ontopia.net>, <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>



> -----Original Message-----
> From: www-rdf-interest-request@w3.org
> [mailto:www-rdf-interest-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of ext Lars Marius
> Garshol
> Sent: 26 August, 2004 11:39
> To: 'RDF interesting groupe'
> Subject: Re: Reification - whats best practice?
> 
> | how do you propose exchanging quad-store data?  My store knows that
> | source x said {a b c}, but how do I publish that fact?
> 
> Well, leaving RDF/XML aside, it doesn't seem very difficult to create
> an XML syntax where the reification is done without having to create
> global identifiers for the statements. 

For an XML serialization of RDF graphs with explicit support for
named graphs (which provide for indirect support for scope, context,
provenance, trust, etc.) in addition to being XSLT and XQuery friendly
c.f. TriX: http://www.hpl.hp.com/techreports/2004/HPL-2004-56

Patrick

--

Patrick Stickler
Nokia, Finland
patrick.stickler@nokia.com
 
Received on Thursday, 26 August 2004 09:10:40 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 5 February 2014 07:14:57 UTC