W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > August 2004

Re: Reification - whats best practice?

From: Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@ontopia.net>
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 17:01:59 +0200
To: <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
Message-ID: <m3acwgzkt4.fsf@pavarotti.intern.opera.no>


* Lars Marius Garshol
|
| Well, leaving RDF/XML aside, it doesn't seem very difficult to
| create an XML syntax where the reification is done without having to
| create global identifiers for the statements.

* Patrick Stickler
| 
| For an XML serialization of RDF graphs with explicit support for
| named graphs (which provide for indirect support for scope, context,
| provenance, trust, etc.) in addition to being XSLT and XQuery friendly
| c.f. TriX: http://www.hpl.hp.com/techreports/2004/HPL-2004-56

I'll do that.

If the description of your and Jeremy Carroll's presentation at
Extreme had spelled out what "naming of graphs" did I would have
attended it, and known about this already. As it was I skipped it,
thinking it was a good thing, but that I didn't need to see it. Oh,
well.

-- 
Lars Marius Garshol, Ontopian         <URL: http://www.ontopia.net >
GSM: +47 98 21 55 50                  <URL: http://www.garshol.priv.no >
Received on Friday, 27 August 2004 15:02:33 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 5 February 2014 07:14:57 UTC