RE: Do we have an rdf ontology for SEN appropriate objectives? as used by the BBC

Assuming Charles is right hear, then we also have some ontology work on
that.
Would be glad for your input open it though Jonathan

Keep well
Lisa

> -----Original Message-----
> From: www-rdf-interest-request@w3.org 
> [mailto:www-rdf-interest-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Charles 
> McCathieNevile
> Sent: Tuesday, August 24, 2004 5:12 PM
> To: Jonathan Chetwynd
> Cc: www-rdf-interest@w3.org
> Subject: Re: Do we have an rdf ontology for SEN appropriate 
> objectives? as used by the BBC
> 
> 
> 
> I'm not sure what SEN means. I'm going to make the rash 
> assumption that it has to do with catering for different 
> levels of understanding.
> 
> I believe that there is some stuff in the IMS accessibility 
> work, and in LOM (some classification stuff about learning 
> objects) that might be suitable. They use XML schemas as a 
> rule, so it would have to be adapted, but if they do indeed 
> have a schema covering this stuff it should be relatively 
> straightforward to adapt it.
> 
> Am I on the right track here?
> 
> cheers
> 
> Chaals
> 
> On Tue, 24 Aug 2004, Jonathan Chetwynd wrote:
> 
> >
> >Do we have an rdf ontology for SEN appropriate objectives? 
> as used by 
> >the BBC:
> >
> >http://www.bbc.co.uk/cbeebies/grownups/somethingspecial/
> >teachersnotes.shtml
> >
> >I've tried to develop interest in this for over 2 years, but 
> have yet 
> >to see anyone using this or a similar model in RDF.
> >
> >thanks
> >
> >
> >Jonathan Chetwynd
> >http://www.peepo.co.uk     "It's easy to use"
> >irc://freenode/accessibility
> >
> >
> 
> Charles McCathieNevile  http://www.w3.org/People/Charles  
> tel: +61 409 134 136
> SWAD-E http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/Europe         fax(france): 
> +33 4 92 38 78 22
>  Post:   21 Mitchell street, FOOTSCRAY Vic 3011, Australia    or
>  W3C, 2004 Route des Lucioles, 06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France
>

Received on Tuesday, 24 August 2004 15:04:45 UTC