W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > August 2004

Re: Do we have an rdf ontology for SEN appropriate objectives? as used by the BBC

From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2004 10:11:39 -0400 (EDT)
To: Jonathan Chetwynd <j.chetwynd@btinternet.com>
Cc: www-rdf-interest@w3.org
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.55.0408241009270.2935@homer.w3.org>

I'm not sure what SEN means. I'm going to make the rash assumption that it
has to do with catering for different levels of understanding.

I believe that there is some stuff in the IMS accessibility work, and in LOM
(some classification stuff about learning objects) that might be suitable.
They use XML schemas as a rule, so it would have to be adapted, but if they
do indeed have a schema covering this stuff it should be relatively
straightforward to adapt it.

Am I on the right track here?



On Tue, 24 Aug 2004, Jonathan Chetwynd wrote:

>Do we have an rdf ontology for SEN appropriate objectives? as used by
>the BBC:
>I've tried to develop interest in this for over 2 years, but have yet
>to see anyone using this or a similar model in RDF.
>Jonathan Chetwynd
>http://www.peepo.co.uk     "It's easy to use"

Charles McCathieNevile  http://www.w3.org/People/Charles  tel: +61 409 134 136
SWAD-E http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/Europe         fax(france): +33 4 92 38 78 22
 Post:   21 Mitchell street, FOOTSCRAY Vic 3011, Australia    or
 W3C, 2004 Route des Lucioles, 06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France
Received on Tuesday, 24 August 2004 14:11:39 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:07:52 UTC