Careful... rdf:li is part of the RDF/XML syntax, but is not of itself a defined property. An RDF parser maps occurrences of this (when used as a property) to rdf:_1, rdf:_2, etc. See also my other message concerning rdfs:member. #g -- At 16:05 08/10/03 -0400, Mark Baker wrote: >On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 03:49:30PM -0400, DuCharme, Bob (LNG-CHO) wrote: > > I guess that rdf:li plays that role > >Good catch. It seems obvious now that you mention it, but I agree that >the name provides ample camouflage. 8-) > >Mark. >-- >Mark Baker. Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA. http://www.markbaker.ca ------------ Graham Klyne GK@NineByNine.orgReceived on Wednesday, 8 October 2003 18:38:45 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:52:02 GMT