W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > October 2003

RE: modeling nested containers with items

From: Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>
Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2003 23:28:42 +0100
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20031008232251.02cd65b0@127.0.0.1>
To: "DuCharme, Bob (LNG-CHO)" <bob.ducharme@lexisnexis.com>, www-rdf-interest@w3.org

Well, there is rdfs:member in the latest RDF revision, of which rdf:_1, 
rdf:_2, etc., are all sub-properties (according to [1]).

#g
--

[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/WD-rdf-mt-20030905/#rdfs_interp


At 12:25 08/10/03 -0400, DuCharme, Bob (LNG-CHO) wrote:

>Oops, that was a typo. I meant to ask if anyone new of a well-known
>namespace with a "contains" predicate, which was why I mentioned the RDF
>Primer's myfoo:container example.
>
>Bob
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: jon@spin.ie [mailto:jon@spin.ie]
>Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2003 12:22 PM
>To: www-rdf-interest@w3.org
>Subject: RE: modeling nested containers with items
>
>
>
> > My new question: instead of the "created" predicate coming from
> > some
> > namespace that I just make up, does anyone know of one with these
>semantics
> > in a more well-known namespace?
>
>Qualified Dublin Core: <http://purl.org/dc/terms/> has a predicate
><http://purl.org/dc/terms/created> for the date something was created. It's
>often used with the W3C datetime format, which uses the extended ISO 8601
>format (with hyphens between parts) rather than the basic ISO 8601 you are
>using. This is common on the web generally and I'd advise you use it for
>interoperability.

------------
Graham Klyne
GK@NineByNine.org
Received on Wednesday, 8 October 2003 18:38:31 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:52:02 GMT