W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > November 2003

RE: Are MGET descriptions workable/necessary?

From: Joshua Allen <joshuaa@microsoft.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2003 15:42:43 -0800
Message-ID: <0E36FD96D96FCA4AA8E8F2D199320E52667689@RED-MSG-43.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
To: "Patrick Stickler" <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>, "ext Phil Dawes" <pdawes@users.sourceforge.net>
Cc: <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>

> > author to maintain a web service describing all his/her terms *at
the
> > url it was defined at*.


> of the resource denoted by that URI, you ask an HTTP server hosted at
> example.com (which is presumed to exist) and usually, you'd GET back a
> representation.

Am I missing something?  I thought the idea of MGET would easily support
something like:

#telnet rdf.mymetadatarepository.com 80
Connected to .....
MGET http://www.ibm.com
.... returns all metadata about ibm.com known to server
mymetadatarepository ...
Received on Monday, 24 November 2003 18:42:47 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:52:03 GMT