W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > January 2003

RE: W3C RDF Validator question

From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2003 10:09:49 +0100
To: "Marjolein Katsma" <wkf1s1l9yfpruqn001@sneakemail.com>, <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>

The underlying engine is ARP.

parseType="Collection" was supported in the ARP released with Jena 1.6.0,
and the latest ARP also supports rdf:datatype.

I would suggest downloading the latest ARP from

and running it locally while the W3C catches up.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: www-rdf-interest-request@w3.org
> [mailto:www-rdf-interest-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Marjolein Katsma
> Sent: 19 January 2003 18:19
> To: www-rdf-interest@w3.org
> Subject: W3C RDF Validator question
> Hi All,
> I tried the W3C RDF Validator for the first time today, to check
> how I'm doing with the beginning of my "catalog" RDF. It nicely
> caught an incorrect end tag; but once I had that corrected I
> found it doesn't recognize rdf:parseType="Collection" (it
> generates a warning for that) - which of course is precisely what
> I'm using for collections of things in my "catalog". As a result,
> almost nothing was parsed.
> Does anyone have any idea when the validator will be updated to
> support everything in the revised RDF/XML syntax (8 November
> 2002) as described in http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-syntax-grammar
> (which is what I'm using)? Or will this need to reach
> recommendation status before it will be implemented in the validator?
> Any other suggestions for checking/validating what I'm writing?
> I had expected a little bit more than just XML well-formedness
> which is all I seem to be getting now.
> --
> Marjolein Katsma
> HomeSite Help - http://hshelp.com/
> Java Woman - http://javawoman.com
Received on Monday, 20 January 2003 04:10:14 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:51:57 GMT