W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > January 2003

Re: W3C RDF Validator question

From: Emmanuel Pietriga <epietriga@yahoo.fr>
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2003 09:30:52 -0500
Message-ID: <3E2C081C.5050201@yahoo.fr>
To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, Marjolein Katsma <wkf1s1l9yfpruqn001@sneakemail.com>
Cc: www-rdf-interest@w3.org

Marjolein,

the W3C RDF Validator should soon be updated. I am currently updating it 
to ARP 2, but I need to run some tests before making it public.

Emmanuel

-- 
Emmanuel Pietriga (emmanuel@w3.org) |  MIT - Laboratory for Computer Science
World Wide Web Consortium (W3C)     |  Room NE43-344
tel: +1 617.253.5327                |  200 Technology Square
fax: +1 617.258.5999                |  Cambridge, MA 02139
http://www.w3.org/People/Emmanuel/






Jeremy Carroll wrote:

>The underlying engine is ARP.
>
>parseType="Collection" was supported in the ARP released with Jena 1.6.0,
>and the latest ARP also supports rdf:datatype.
>
>I would suggest downloading the latest ARP from
>http://www-uk.hpl.hp.com/people/jjc/arp
>
>and running it locally while the W3C catches up.
>
>Jeremy
>
>  
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: www-rdf-interest-request@w3.org
>>[mailto:www-rdf-interest-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Marjolein Katsma
>>Sent: 19 January 2003 18:19
>>To: www-rdf-interest@w3.org
>>Subject: W3C RDF Validator question
>>
>>
>>
>>Hi All,
>>
>>I tried the W3C RDF Validator for the first time today, to check
>>how I'm doing with the beginning of my "catalog" RDF. It nicely
>>caught an incorrect end tag; but once I had that corrected I
>>found it doesn't recognize rdf:parseType="Collection" (it
>>generates a warning for that) - which of course is precisely what
>>I'm using for collections of things in my "catalog". As a result,
>>almost nothing was parsed.
>>
>>Does anyone have any idea when the validator will be updated to
>>support everything in the revised RDF/XML syntax (8 November
>>2002) as described in http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-syntax-grammar
>>(which is what I'm using)? Or will this need to reach
>>recommendation status before it will be implemented in the validator?
>>
>>Any other suggestions for checking/validating what I'm writing?
>>I had expected a little bit more than just XML well-formedness
>>which is all I seem to be getting now.
>>
>>
>>
>>--
>>Marjolein Katsma
>>HomeSite Help - http://hshelp.com/
>>Java Woman - http://javawoman.com
>>
>>
>>    
>>
>
>  
>
Received on Tuesday, 21 January 2003 08:29:19 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:51:57 GMT