It also misses RxPath (understandably, since it didn't exist at the time) . RxPath maps RDF's abstract syntax to the XPath data model and is syntactically identical to XPath 1.0. It was in large part inspired by Versa -- I liked the ideas of versa but wanted something more, well, xpath-like -- and is implemented on top of 4Suite. see http://rx4rdf.liminalzone.org , in particular http://rx4rdf.liminalzone.org/RxPathSpec for a formal specification. (But unfortunately there seems to be a problem with the router one hop away from my server and parts of the internet can't access this site right now.) -- adam Uche Ogbuji wrote: >>Pondering RDF Path: >><http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-rules/2003Sep/0001.html> >> >>Sean's page also provides some useful links on rdf path languages. It's >>certainly an interesting area, and it would be interesting getting you >>views on the subject. >> >> > >FYI all, Sean misses Versa > >http://uche.ogbuji.net/tech/rdf/versa/ > >Which I consider to be a path-like language, although it does have enough >functional power to met all the challenges that Eric Prud'hommeaux claims are >beyond path-like languages. I find that to be the right compromise for RDF >query. There is a 95% complete implementation in 4Suite and one in >development for rdflib. > > > >Received on Wednesday, 31 December 2003 14:25:38 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:52:03 GMT