Jeen Broekstra wrote: > By the way, most[1] inferencers over RDF Schema interpret the > domain/range property semantics as inference rules rather than > constraints, which basically means that whenever you introduce a > property p with a certain range R (p rdfs:range R), and you introduce a > instance a with that property (a p b), its value is automatically > derived to be of type R (b rdf:type R). But there is no way to define the property p *using only the RDF and RDFS vocabulary*, such that the RDF Model thory would entail {ex:b rdf:type ex:R.} from {ex:p rdfs:range ex:R. ex:a ex:p ex:b.}, is there ? Not that it's important ... im just curious, that's all ... Seth Russell Logic is great, survival is better.Received on Friday, 20 September 2002 09:29:06 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:51:56 GMT