W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > September 2002

RE: rdfs:Property rdfs:range questions

From: Jon Hanna <jon@spin.ie>
Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2002 12:50:37 +0100
To: <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
Message-ID: <NDBBLCBLIMDOPKMOPHLHEEOBEGAA.jon@spin.ie>

> Your explanation and pointers made this clear; there is no point in two
> dissjoint ranges. Actually it was rather silly from my part because my
> two ranges are not dissjoint after all; I was trying to create a
> measurment toolkit, where objects could be either a resource or a
> literal; at first i used multiple (two) ranges, rdfs:Resource and
> rdfs:Literal.

IIRC OWL allows you to have statements closer to your original intent (i.e.
you can define a range as being the union of two classes, hence allowing you
to define a range that allows members of two or more disjoint classes to be
used).
Received on Friday, 20 September 2002 07:47:11 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:51:56 GMT