Hi John, Jeen, Thanks for your replies. Ok from what I understand of the spec [1], the default value is rdfs:Class. Your explanation and pointers made this clear; there is no point in two dissjoint ranges. Actually it was rather silly from my part because my two ranges are not dissjoint after all; I was trying to create a measurment toolkit, where objects could be either a resource or a literal; at first i used multiple (two) ranges, rdfs:Resource and rdfs:Literal. But I can just use rdfs:Class (which is the superclass of rdfs:Literal) and get over with it :-) [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-schema/#ch_range Thanks again, ManosReceived on Friday, 20 September 2002 07:36:06 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 23 April 2007 18:20:01 GMT