My understanding is that DC has no ties to RDF -- it is just a simple set of well-defined metadata properties that work equally well in HTML, XML, or RDF. RSS 2.0 could (and should where the logical definitions coincide) use DC without RDF. In a message dated 10/4/2002 5:02:22 AM US Mountain Standard Time, dehora@eircom.net writes: > > > In the meantime, Dublin Core strikes me as sufficient RDF > > for RSS 2.0. > > > > Point of information: Dublin Core is a bibliographic metadata > > vocabulary which is independent from, and which predates RDF. > > Yes. In the context of this discussion, DC in RSS [1] is going to go > through RDF; so with all due respect I think you're splitting hairs. > Unless you think RDF should be cut out and DC embedded in a different > way in RSS? > > - Mike ---------------------------------------------------- Michael C. Daconta Director, Web & Technology Services www.mcbrad.comReceived on Friday, 4 October 2002 15:15:39 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 23 April 2007 18:20:02 GMT