Janne Saarela wrote: > I agree. When developing our RDF based software we had to > support typing. The way we do it now is by referring to > XML Schema basic data types with URIs as rdfs:range values. > > Of course, basic data types are easy but applying facets > makes life trickier. Perhaps simpleTypes and complexTypes > could also be URI addressed within an XML schema file? Just a thought: would it be possible within your scheme to provide occurences of simpleType and complexType you wish to be addressable with ids and then refer to them invididually using a fragment in the URI? -- Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@expway.fr> Research Engineer, Expway 7FC0 6F5F D864 EFB8 08CE 8E74 58E6 D5DB 4889 2488Received on Thursday, 22 August 2002 08:53:50 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:51:55 GMT