W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > April 2002

RE: XML Schema vs DAML/RDF/RDFS

From: Bill de hÓra <dehora@eircom.net>
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2002 16:21:39 +0100
To: <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
Message-ID: <000601c1e6ec$bd814300$887ba8c0@mitchum>
 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


> -----Original Message-----
> From: www-rdf-interest-request@w3.org 
> [mailto:www-rdf-interest-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Graham
> Klyne Sent: 18 April 2002 14:25
> To: R.V.Guha
> Cc: www-rdf-interest@w3.org
> Subject: Re: XML Schema vs DAML/RDF/RDFS
> 
> 
> This is a topic which seems to be popping up in number of 
> areas recently.
> 
> Part of the problem, I think, is that an single application 
> gets relatively 
> little benefit from using RDF -- the real benefits come when
> multiple  applications can exchange information without having to
> go through  transformation steps, which I think is the big appeal
> of RDF. 
>   (e.g. [1] 
> contains some notes for a talk I gave to our development team 
> a year or so 
> ago.)

That's an interesting take. But is there evidence that network
effects apply to RDF, or is it informed speculation?

Bill de hÓra

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 7.0.4

iQA/AwUBPL7kgeaWiFwg2CH4EQIWcwCg5yff07SyKjvG/+Og8Whh/9I5qQEAnRgC
Mnmu1Rj96MKeuzqYCMArUpSo
=gzih
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Thursday, 18 April 2002 11:28:18 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:51:53 GMT