W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > April 2002

Re: XML Schema vs DAML/RDF/RDFS

From: Sigfrid Lundberg, NetLab <siglun@gungner.lub.lu.se>
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2002 16:29:45 +0200 (CEST)
To: Geoff Chappell <geoff@sover.net>
cc: Libby Miller <Libby.Miller@bristol.ac.uk>, Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>, "R.V.Guha" <guha@guha.com>, www-rdf-interest <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0204181628490.2881-100000@allegro.lub.lu.se>
On Thu, 18 Apr 2002, Geoff Chappell wrote:

...

> I'd personally like see more work on providing a simple, standard inference
> language to rdf so that rdf schema authors can ship along valid inferences
> with their schemas (that aren't restricted to the available vocabulary.)

Well, the Harmony project have a metadata element thesaurus, haven't they.
That is pretty close.

Sigge
Received on Thursday, 18 April 2002 10:26:08 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:51:53 GMT