W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > November 2001

Re: [Paper:] Logical Interpretations of RDFS - A Compatibility Guide

From: <tarod@softhome.net>
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2001 15:21:28 GMT
Message-ID: <20011119152128.3203.qmail@softhome.net>
To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
Cc: conen@gmx.de, www-rdf-interest@w3.org

  I just read the paper of Wolfram Conen and Reinhold Klapsing and I
totally agree with them. About the mail sent by Peter F. Patel-Schneider...
again and again you are explaining rdfschema in function of DAML+OIL, why
the hell don't we forget DAML to explain RDFSchema. RDF and RDFSchema
doesn't need DAML to be explained and the new approach for the range/domain
semantic does not make any sense excluding DAML.

  Regards,
           Marc

  PD: Why don't we ask Sun to add pointers to Java in order to make our
programs run faster?
Received on Monday, 19 November 2001 10:56:13 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:51:52 GMT