W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > May 2001

Mentographs a go-go

From: Danny Ayers <danny@panlanka.net>
Date: Thu, 3 May 2001 23:26:35 +0600
To: "RDF-Interest" <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
Message-ID: <EBEPLGMHCDOJJJPCFHEFOEMODEAA.danny@panlanka.net>
Look what you've done now Seth, even TimBL's at it :

http://www.w3.org/2001/04/roadmap/


---
Danny Ayers
http://www.isacat.net

<- -----Original Message-----
<- From: www-rdf-interest-request@w3.org
<- [mailto:www-rdf-interest-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Seth Russell
<- Sent: 03 May 2001 22:35
<- To: Jan Grant
<- Cc: Danny Ayers; Www-Rdf-Logic; RDF-Interest
<- Subject: Re: relational mapping?
<-
<-
<- From: "Jan Grant" <Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk>
<-
<- > > No doubt you are aware of the list of these recorded at [1], to which
<- list I
<- > > have added the structure diagrammed at [2].
<- > >
<- > > [1] http://www-db.stanford.edu/~melnik/rdf/db.html
<- > > [2] http://robustai.net/mentography/SemStructure.gif
<- >
<- > Neat; but these seem to be "storing RDF in RDBMS" as opposed to
<- > "producing RDF from a (legacy?) RDBMS"
<-
<- Ok sorry, I see now you want to go the other direction.  I saw somewhere
<- (forget where) the idea that you could do it this way:
<-
<- A RDF Class represents a Relational Table.
<- A RDF instance node represents a Relational Record.
<- The columns in the Relational table are the property arcs on the instance
<- nodes.
<-
<- Hope that helps.
<- Seth
<-
<-
Received on Thursday, 3 May 2001 13:31:04 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:51:49 GMT