Re: in CWM, how does one know that a quad is asserted vs. quoted?

Aaron Swartz wrote:
> Jonathan Borden <jborden@mediaone.net> wrote:
>
> > to be clear, CWM/N3 diverges from RDF 1.0 in that:
> >
> > 1) statements are 'automatically' asserted merely by being present in
the
> > graph

Err.... that should be "statements are not 'automatically' asserted by being
present in the graph." Thanks for picking this up.

>
> Can you explain how this is a divergence from RDF 1.0?
>

The truth status of other statements are as TimBL describes. That is a quad
may be present without being asserted.

-Jonathan