- From: Jonathan Borden <jborden@mediaone.net>
- Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2001 15:27:31 -0400
- To: "Aaron Swartz" <aswartz@swartzfam.com>, "RDF Interest" <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
Aaron Swartz wrote: > Jonathan Borden <jborden@mediaone.net> wrote: > > > to be clear, CWM/N3 diverges from RDF 1.0 in that: > > > > 1) statements are 'automatically' asserted merely by being present in the > > graph Err.... that should be "statements are not 'automatically' asserted by being present in the graph." Thanks for picking this up. > > Can you explain how this is a divergence from RDF 1.0? > The truth status of other statements are as TimBL describes. That is a quad may be present without being asserted. -Jonathan
Received on Monday, 4 June 2001 15:44:25 UTC