W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > June 2001

Re: in CWM, how does one know that a quad is asserted vs. quoted?

From: Jonathan Borden <jborden@mediaone.net>
Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2001 15:27:31 -0400
Message-ID: <083901c0ed2c$664a6770$0a2e249b@nemc.org>
To: "Aaron Swartz" <aswartz@swartzfam.com>, "RDF Interest" <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
Aaron Swartz wrote:
> Jonathan Borden <jborden@mediaone.net> wrote:
> > to be clear, CWM/N3 diverges from RDF 1.0 in that:
> >
> > 1) statements are 'automatically' asserted merely by being present in
> > graph

Err.... that should be "statements are not 'automatically' asserted by being
present in the graph." Thanks for picking this up.

> Can you explain how this is a divergence from RDF 1.0?

The truth status of other statements are as TimBL describes. That is a quad
may be present without being asserted.

Received on Monday, 4 June 2001 15:44:25 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:51:49 GMT