W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > June 2001

Re: in CWM, how does one know that a quad is asserted vs. quoted?

From: Aaron Swartz <aswartz@swartzfam.com>
Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2001 14:15:29 -0500
To: Jonathan Borden <jborden@mediaone.net>, RDF Interest <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
Message-ID: <B7414881.D1BD%aswartz@swartzfam.com>

Jonathan Borden <jborden@mediaone.net> wrote:

> to be clear, CWM/N3 diverges from RDF 1.0 in that:
>
> 1) statements are 'automatically' asserted merely by being present in the
> graph

Can you explain how this is a divergence from RDF 1.0?

-- 
[ Aaron Swartz | me@aaronsw.com | http://www.aaronsw.com ]

Received on Monday, 4 June 2001 15:15:37 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Jonathan Borden: "Re: in CWM, how does one know that a quad is asserted vs. quoted?"
Previous message: Murray Altheim: "Re: [topicmapmail] RDF and TopicMaps: an Exercise in Convergence"
In reply to: Jonathan Borden: "RE: in CWM, how does one know that a quad is asserted vs. quoted?"
Next in thread: Jonathan Borden: "Re: in CWM, how does one know that a quad is asserted vs. quoted?"
Reply: Jonathan Borden: "Re: in CWM, how does one know that a quad is asserted vs. quoted?"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:51:49 GMT