> Stefan, > > In general one wouldn't expect a sub-property of a transitive property > to be transitive itself, e.g., parent as a sub-property of ancestor. > > Ian Related to this: I think you can state that, for a property to be transitive, all of its superproperties have to be transitive too. From the RDF/S spec: "If some property P2 is a subPropertyOf another more general property P1, and if a resource A has a P2 property with a value B, this implies that the resource A also has a P1 property with value B." Now consider P2 to be a transitive property and you have the following situation: X --P2--> Y --P2--> Z In that case, X would also be related to Z through P2 and thus, as P1 is a superproperty of P2, also through P1. Therefore P1 also has to transitive. Please correct me if I'm wrong, ArjohnReceived on Thursday, 25 January 2001 08:10:03 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 23 April 2007 18:19:46 GMT