From: "Danny Ayers" <danny@panlanka.net> > I don't think if...then... needs to be associated with anything active at > all - it's only a relationship. Well documented (as a 'production rule') in > the expert systems domain. James Tauber's approach with RDF looks good. The > inferencing system will make sense of it, presumably along with the rest of > the metadata. But then what is the answer to my question in the example below? > <- For example: if a RDF model knows {Seth isA Male} and {Male addressedBy > <- "Mr"} and {[; young Male] addressedBy "boy"}, what is the value of the > <- <value> ? Yes, you can certainly represent the mapping of the production rules in RDF. But, imho, you cannot say "if <class> then <value>" without specifying an agent and a method ... so that untill you do, that construct would always remain vague and useless. SethReceived on Saturday, 28 April 2001 13:14:52 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 23 April 2007 18:19:49 GMT