W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > February 2000

RE: SV: A certain difficulty - lack of action!

From: Jeff Sussna <jeff.sussna@quokka.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2000 10:29:56 -0800
Message-ID: <E19A882C6CD5D211A8A70008C75B6AF40122CFD9@pcmail.quokka.com>
To: "'Sergey Melnik'" <melnik@db.stanford.edu>, David Megginson <david@megginson.com>
Cc: xml-dev@xml.org, www-rdf-interest@w3.org
Fabulous! This syntax would address my foremost complaint with RDF: the
model is property-centric but the syntax really isn't. The "canonical"
description format is really a shortcut of its own, and one that obscures
the basic property-centric quality of RDF. Sergey's proposed syntax is
(IMHO) just what the doctor ordered.


-----Original Message-----
From: Sergey Melnik [mailto:melnik@db.stanford.edu]
Sent: Saturday, February 26, 2000 9:21 AM
To: David Megginson
Cc: xml-dev@xml.org; www-rdf-interest@w3.org
Subject: Re: SV: A certain difficulty - lack of action!

[ snip ]

As a next step I'd like to have a "poorest man" RDF/XML serialization:

  <triple subject="[URI]" predicate="[URI]" object="[URI]"/>
  <triple subject="[URI]" predicate="[URI]">[PDCATA]</triple>

This serialization is unambiguous, self-explaining, and can be
implemented using 10 lines of code. It would provide a good reference
point for determining what features in the current RDF/XML serialization
are syntactic sugar (e.g. aboutEach) or bugs (i.e. not reflected in the
model like xml:lang, aboutEachPrefix etc.)

[ snip ]
Received on Monday, 28 February 2000 13:24:45 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:07:29 UTC