Hi Brian, I'm a little confused - > I suspect that you are writing a document from the point of view that > you are specifying the behaviour of software. The RDF specs are written > more from the point of view that they define the syntax and meaning of > RDF documents. This would explain why you might not find some of the > things you expect. I realise that 'RDF Test Cases' [1] deals with the edge cases ("...a set of machine-processable test cases corresponding to technical issues addressed by the Working Group..."), but isn't there an implied notion of compliance: <something> passes these tests? Isn't this specifying the behaviour of software? Putting it another way, say the rest of the grammar was framed in similar tests, would would this supply a conformance model, and if so, for what? Cheers, Danny. [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-testcases/Received on Sunday, 30 November 2003 06:04:12 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 18:22:18 GMT