pfps-04

Peter,

with reference to your comment recorded as

http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/#pfps-04

the RDFCore WG has resolved to accept your comment.

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Jul/0173.html

As you know, there have been extensive modifications to the RDF 
entailment rules since your comment was written

The current editor's draft, which is now stable enough to review,

http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/TR/WD-rdf-mt-20030117/

now contains a version of the RDF entailment rules which we believe 
corresponds directly to the RDF semantic conditions in the sense 
described. You can check the proof contained in the specification.

Please reply to this message, copying www-rdf-comments@w3.org, 
indicating whether this response adequately addresses your comment.

Brian