Re: [qu-04] rdfcore issue, 'rdf/xml representation'

It's acceptable.

Yuzhong Qu

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Dan Brickley" <danbri@w3.org>
To: <yzqu@seu.edu.cn>
Cc: <www-rdf-comments@w3.org>
Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 6:44 PM
Subject: [qu-04] rdfcore issue, 'rdf/xml representation'


> Many thanks for your comments on the RDF Schema Last Call Working Draft,
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0219.html
> 
> The RDF Core Working Group discussed your suggestions on June 6th [1], and
> as outlined in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003May/0224.$
> we accept most of your proposed edits to the specification. The only
> change we don't plan to make is to explicitly assert
> 'rdfs:Resource subclass of rdfs:Resource' since there are numerous
> similar assertions which would add little to the document.
> 
> Please reply to this message as to whether this response is
> satisfactory, copying www-rdf-comments@w3.org. Again, thank
> you for your comments.
> 
> Dan
> 
> [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Jun/0067.html
> 
>