W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-comments@w3.org > April to June 2003

[closed] Re: [qu-04] rdfcore issue, 'rdf/xml representation'

From: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2003 09:13:09 -0400
To: Yuzhong Qu <yzqu@seu.edu.cn>
Cc: rdf-comments <www-rdf-comments@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20030618131309.GA11302@tux.w3.org>

Great. Thanks again, --danbri

* Yuzhong Qu <yzqu@seu.edu.cn> [2003-06-18 19:55+0800]
> It's acceptable.
> 
> Yuzhong Qu
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Dan Brickley" <danbri@w3.org>
> To: <yzqu@seu.edu.cn>
> Cc: <www-rdf-comments@w3.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 6:44 PM
> Subject: [qu-04] rdfcore issue, 'rdf/xml representation'
> 
> 
> > Many thanks for your comments on the RDF Schema Last Call Working Draft,
> > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0219.html
> > 
> > The RDF Core Working Group discussed your suggestions on June 6th [1], and
> > as outlined in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003May/0224.$
> > we accept most of your proposed edits to the specification. The only
> > change we don't plan to make is to explicitly assert
> > 'rdfs:Resource subclass of rdfs:Resource' since there are numerous
> > similar assertions which would add little to the document.
> > 
> > Please reply to this message as to whether this response is
> > satisfactory, copying www-rdf-comments@w3.org. Again, thank
> > you for your comments.
> > 
> > Dan
> > 
> > [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Jun/0067.html
> > 
> > 
Received on Wednesday, 18 June 2003 09:13:16 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 21 September 2012 14:16:32 GMT